Full Title: Grammatical gaps: Definition, typology and theory
Short Title: GrammGapsDGfS43
Date: 24-Feb-2021 – 26-Feb-2021
Location: Freiburg, Germany
Contact Person: Thomas Strobel
Meeting Email: < click here to access email >
Linguistic Field(s): Historical Linguistics; Linguistic Theories; Morphology; Syntax; Typology
Call Deadline: 20-Sep-2020
Meeting Description:
Workshop organizers: Thomas Strobel and Helmut Weiß (Goethe University Frankfurt)
Invited speakers (confirmed): Marga Reis (University of Tübingen) and Andrea Sims (The Ohio State University)
Every language’s grammar exhibits systematic gaps and rule conflicts, i.e. grammars do not fully and/or consistently determine all logically possible constellations (or in Sapir’s famous words: »Unfortunately, or luckily, no language is tyrannically consistent. All grammars leak »). This fact has to be taken into consideration by »realistic » grammar theories (Reis 2017).
In this exploratory workshop, we want to address the topic of structural gaps or defectiveness from a definitional, descriptive-typological and explanative-theoretical perspective (Strobel & Weiß 2019):
– Despite some delimitation problems, the concept of morphological, especially paradigmatic gaps or inflectional defectiveness (Sims 2015) seems to be quite clear, referring to expected (and often predictable) but non-existent forms of certain lexemes. For syntax, though, it is far less obvious what should be understood as a gap in this sense and if this should be determined contrastively by language comparison (e.g. the absence of relative clauses in some languages) or purely system-inherently (verb agreement with complex or coordinated subject noun phrases).
– Which cross-linguistic generalizations can be drawn with respect to common areas of defectiveness, which parts of grammar, e.g. syntactic categories, are affected (most), and which areas seem to be immune instead?
– (Semantically) expected gaps (e.g. the lack of plural forms for mass nouns) can be distinguished from arbitrary gaps. By which (non-general) principles can the latter be explained historically and/or systematically (phonological/phonotactic, morphological, syntactic, pragmatic causes)?
– Which mechanisms are used to (potentially) fill synchronic gaps or eliminate defectiveness (suppletion, periphrases, borrowing etc.), which ones instead operate on system-immanent and thus irremediable conflicts (in syntax e.g. syncretisms, leading to ‘grammatical illusions’)?
– Can the concept of gradience in grammar (gradient/relative grammaticality, vague grammaticality judgments etc.) be taken over to gradient defectiveness?
Second Call for Papers:
We invite submissions for 20-minute oral presentations (+ 10 minutes discussion) in English or German. We are equally interested in theoretical and empirical contributions with evidence from all languages or dialects as well as from all morphological and syntactic frameworks. Contributions on related topics such as Ineffability, grammatical doubts or uncertainties (which, among others, can be explained by gaps or conflicts) and grammatical illusions are also warmly welcome.
Abstracts should clearly state the research question(s), the methodological approach as well as the (expected) results and should not exceed 1 page length (A4, Times New Roman, 12 point, single-spaced), excluding references. The (extended) deadline for submission is 20 September 2020. Please submit your abstract anonymously to: https://easychair.org/cfp/GrammGaps-DGfS43.
A limited number of travel grants of up to 500 Euro are available for accepted contributions by DGfS members without or with low income. Please note that the regulations of the DGfS do not allow that workshop participants present two or more papers in different workshops.
References:
Reis, Marga. 2017. Grammatische Variation und realistische Grammatik. In Marek Konopka & Angelika Wöllstein (eds.), Grammatische Variation. Empirische Zugänge und theore¬tische Modellierung, 255-282. Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter.
Sims, Andrea D. 2015. Inflectional Defectiveness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strobel, Thomas & Helmut Weiß. 2019. Von sprachlichen und nicht-sprachlichen Lücken. In Gerrit Kentner, Frank Kügler, Beata Moskal & Stavros Skopeteas (eds.), Tweets ‘n greets for Caroline Féry on the occasion of her farewell from Goethe-University Frankfurt, 111-117. URL: https://www.linguistik-in-frankfurt.de/blog/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Tweet-n-greets_CarolineFery.pdf.